Taylor Marsh = Hillary’s Ann Coulter

February 18, 2008 · Posted in Uncategorized 

Ann Coulter:

Huckabee is a “compassionate conservative” only in the sense that calling him a conservative is being compassionate.

Taylor Marsh:

Barack Obama isn’t an original. He’s the first 21st century L. Ron Hubbard of politics, Elmer Gantry, name your huckster.

Can you imagine four years of this bullshit? Taylor Marsh on CNN and Huffpo every day, shrilly proclaiming Senate Democrats as “closet conservatives”, berating the electorate for not supporting Hillary’s push to garnish wages for those slackers who didn’t sign up for the best damn health insurance on the planet, calling for the castration of every male who uses the word “claws” in a sentence? Excoriating bankers for fighting a mortgage interest freeze, while telling our troops to get “fired up and ready to go” for a stint in Iran?

I’ve seen that future. I don’t like it. I’m tired of waking up in the morning and hearing more shrill, irrational proclamations and hyperbole.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Sphere: Related Content

Tags: , ,

Comments

  • A harsh comparison, but truer words were never spoken.
  • JoeCitizen
    Bingo.
    Great comparison.
  • Pug
    Taylor's complete plunge into insanity started not long after Super Tuesday. She's been getting shriller and shriller since.

    I think that's a word, right? Shriller? If it isn't it should be.
  • Donna,

    It's those shades of gray that are going to eat the Dems alive. Shrill apologists like Taylor Marsh and Howard Wolfson who continue to insist on dragging the campaigns down into the mud are going to do harm to the Democrats in the national election. The GOP are grinning over this little scuffle, which is really nothing at all but is so full of loaded, nasty language that it gives all sorts of little negative bites for November TV ads.

    I can honestly say that if it continues in this vein, I would have a great deal of difficulty being supportive of HRC should she win the nomination.
  • I find this very disturbing. I always thought of the right as people who see things in black and white, with no shades of gray -- that Democratic party is messier because we are more tolerant of differences. That has always appealed to me, because the world IS complicated and none of us is going to have the exact same opinion on EVERY issue. We don't need no stinkin' litmus tests, and I don't want to give credence to someone who applies them.
blog comments powered by Disqus