Child Exploitation for Prop 8

October 28, 2008 · Posted in Election 2008 

Update: Embedding has now been disabled on this video, but it can be viewed here.

I don’t even know how to respond to it. I was reviled, both by the lyrics, the spirit, the bastardization of a child’s tune, and what it taught the children who sang it.

It’s horrible. And they dared to suggest that it was “for the children”. Wow. Not for my children.

Suffer the little children…

Vote NO on Prop 8

Sphere: Related Content

Tags: , , , ,

Comments

  • They've taken the video down. :(
  • No, it's not down. They disabled embedding, You can view it here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlItG4raicA
  • it really makes me cry -- and NOT for joy. when the parents look back on this video years from now and realize they were on the wrong side of history, i hope they help their kids forgive themselves for inadvertently spreading harm. kids: it is NOT NOT NOT your fault! best of luck and love to you in all things in the future...
  • Have you read proposition 8? It is a strange construct for an English sentence.

    You have to be very careful when writing constitutional language. If they are defining Marriage in one sentence, then they haven't excluded incest, for example.

    Will Judges be compelled, to legalize incest. (as http://RavagedFaces.com/ suggests) based on that wording? I'd be very afraid to vote YES on this one.
  • Yes, I've read it. The singular article "a" is understood as a singular
    term. There are lots of reasons to oppose Prop 8, but incest and bigamy are
    not two of them.
  • ursulas
    Ridiculous! What desperate fools to use kids like that and contaminate their minds with hate.
  • Incredibly warped - sad that these kids are being parented by bigoted haters.
blog comments powered by Disqus