Blackwater, Mormons, and Evangelicals: Prop. 8 Strange Bedfellows

October 28, 2008 · Posted in Election 2008 

The more I dig down into Proposition 8, the more bizarre the facts are. Like everyone else, I like to follow the money to identify the agendas. Here’s what I know:

Blackwater

From Calitics.com

Andrew Sullivan notes today that one of the biggest financial supporters of the Yes on 8 campaign is Elsa Prince Broekhuizen, who has pumped $450,000 into the campaign. Broekhuizen is the mother of Blackwater founder and owner Erik Prince and Bush Pioneer Betsy DeVos. She’s also quite the patron of the religious right.

At first blush, the two groups don’t have a whole lot in common besides neighboring real estate in the political spectrum. But as Blackwater continues its unwanted presence in San Diego (spawning aspirants to the throne in Hemet), Michigan resident Broekhuizen is just a big fish in the flood of out-of-state money trying to buy their way into a change to California’s constitution.

Blackwater, you remember them. They’re the contractors hired by the Bush Administration to privatize our military. That money is now being recycled into politics by huge donations to campaigns like the Yes on 8 campaign.

To be clear, that’s YOUR taxpayer money, laundered a couple of times.

Mormon Church

From the Salt Lake Tribune

The LDS Church’s campaign to pass Proposition 8 represents its most vigorous and widespread political involvement since the late 1970s, when it helped defeat the Equal Rights Amendment. It even departs from earlier efforts on behalf of traditional marriage, in which members felt more free to decide their level of involvement.
This time, LDS leaders have tapped every resource, including the church’s built-in phone trees, e-mail lists and members’ willingness to volunteer and donate money. Many California members consider it a directive from God and have pressured others to participate. Some leaders and members see it as a test of faith and loyalty.

The Mormons have given $8.4 million to the campaign for Proposition 8. That’s the tithes of Mormons, taken out of the church and funnelled into the political process. 8.4 million dollars.

sfgate.com:

Prop. 8 is on pace to be the costliest race in the nation, except for the billion-dollar presidential election. The Yes on 8 campaign estimates that up to 40 percent of its donations come from Mormons. Some others estimate that Mormons account for over 70 percent of donations from individuals.

Today, the Courage Campaign delivered a petition to Mormon church President Thomas Monson signed by 16,935 people urging the Mormon church to cease funding the Proposition 8 campaign.

I won’t even address how offensive it is to have tax-exempt religious organizations inject money and resources into politics. Whatever their agenda, they are making an effort with a lot of tax-exempt money to shape the political landscape via out-of-state money and resources.

Evangelicals

Finally, we have the evangelical movement and I would say most specifically, the Baptists. This boggles my mind, because in other, more reasonable days the Baptists wanted nothing to do with any political initiative, fearing (rightly) that injecting themselves into politics would erode the church/state wall. When Rick Warren of Saddleback Church (and author of the Purpose-Driven Life) endorsed the Yes on 8 campaign, he ignored all of the traditionally Baptist beliefs about keeping church and state separate.

Randall Ballmer:

Warren, a Baptist, knows better. The cornerstones of the Baptist tradition are adult baptism (as opposed to infant baptism) and the principle of liberty of conscience and the separation of church and state. Baptists inherited these ideas from Roger Williams, the founder of the Baptist tradition in America. And, at least until the conservative takeover of the Southern Baptist Convention in 1979, Baptists have always been watchmen on that wall of separation and fierce guardians of liberty of conscience. Thankfully, Williams’s ideas were incorporated into the United States Constitution, both in the First Amendment, which forbade a religious establishment, and in the recurring principle of respect for the rights of minorities.

In an increasingly bizarre election year we have an incredibly bizarre campaign to discriminate against an entire group in our society, backed by privatized military, and two powerful religious forces who ordinarily have nothing to do with one another.

I’ll end with this: According to the FBI, hate crimes are down. Well, they’re down with one exception: Hate crimes against gays increased 6% in the past year.

Imagine what it’ll be like if Yes on 8 passes. Why? Well, let’s start with the long and ugly campaign where phrases like “don’t let them have this too” and “restore marriage” (implying that GLBT folks are far too low to have such a right, etc) have predominated the debate. Where the Constitution is turned on its head and churches are willing to crawl into bed with the likes of Blackwater.

You don’t think more hate will spring forth? Guess again.

Here are some ways to help:

Because equality is a RIGHT in this country. For ALL. Not the religious or the military only, the righteous and the conservative. It is a right for ALL. Regardless.

Sphere: Related Content

Comments

  • DJS
    "The Mormons have given $8.4 million to the campaign for Proposition 8. That’s the tithes of Mormons, taken out of the church and funnelled into the political process. 8.4 million dollars."

    This statement is completely false and defamatory. Have you not read the news, or the LDS Church's own press release encouraging its members to give of THEIR OWN "time and means" to support the Yes campaign? I'm not sure if the number is $8.4 million or not, but whatever the correct number is, it is AFTER-TAX, PERSONAL FUNDS of MEMBERS of the LDS Church, the most faithful of whom already pay a 10% tithe. THE LDS CHURCH ITSELF DID NOT INJECT ONE PENNY INTO THE PROPOSITION 8 CAMPAIGN.

    My apologies for "yelling" through the use of all-caps. But post is among several dozen that I have read in the various media that falsely accuses the LDS Church of contributing some of the funds it receives from members' contributions toward the campaign. Fortunately, I read many other articles and posts that have gotten it right. Please read those yourself and confirm their accuracy. Once you have, it would be appropriate for you to issue a correction and retraction.
  • Then why are they listed on the Secretary of State's listings as
    contributors? Contributors who gave big bucks,too.
  • equidirt
    Send the link. Would "hate" to see this unresolved and contribute to more "bigotry" based on a misunderstanding? Fact checking agents of oppression.

    Regarding disguised funds, you mention in an earlier email - Suuure!

    Aren't blogs fun - you can say anything you can imagine as though it is true.
  • Confused
    "The Mormons have given $8.4 million to the campaign for Proposition 8. That’s the tithes of Mormons, taken out of the church and funnelled into the political process. 8.4 million dollars."

    I could be wrong (but don't think so) all donations came from private individuals. The leadership of the church may have encouraged contributions, but no "tithes" from the church were ever funnelled into the campaign.

    "I won’t even address how offensive it is to have tax-exempt religious organizations inject money and resources into politics. Whatever their agenda, they are making an effort with a lot of tax-exempt money to shape the political landscape via out-of-state money and resources".

    If funds are from private sources, then an organization's tax-exempt status shouldn't even be brought into question. I read the regulations regarding organizations with 501c-3 status and as I understood it they have the right to lobby for issues they support, but not to support/attack political candidates. Maybe I'm simple minded but how does it differ than people donating large sums against the proposition or any other issue? How many of those have 501c-3 status?

    Are the people donating it to the church or the the campaign?
  • Jusitn
    What is funny about this is that the Baptists hate the Mormons. I am one of the unfortunates who lives in Utah and is not Mo, and I used to work for a company that sells animated Bible stories (I think they call themselves NEST, or at least they did back in the 90s). They started out making Book of Mormon animated stories, and I remember being told that it would be better that a pornographic movie be accidentally mixed in to a batch of NEST movies sold in the south than it would a Book of Mo video. I still laugh at that today.
  • Jay
    The LDS church has not donated a dime to proposition 8. Rather church leaders encouraged individual members to do so. "Mormons" have donated millions, but no "tax exempt" tithes have been used for this political purpose. All donations have been voluntarily given from individuals. This is nothing like the California Teachers Union donated $1.5 million union dues to the "No on 8" campaign without seeking permission from its members.
  • Frank
    "how offensive it is to have tax-exempt religious organizations inject money and resources into politics"

    What about all those tax-exempt and tax payer funded organizations that inject money and resources into politics. You have no problem with that? Perhaps it's ok when they support your position.

    In the United States we freedom of religion. Most religions believe that marriage is defined as between 1 man and 1 women. No on prop 8 will open up religious organizations to litigation because of their beliefs. This is unacceptable in the United States.
  • Frank,

    What tax-exempt money is that, exactly? My contribution to the No on 8
    campaign was after-tax, non-deductible funds.

    I find it a bit laughable that you would claim to support only selective
    freedoms. This is the first time in California history that an amendment to
    the state constitution has been proposed that excludes people and creates
    different classes of citizens.

    Congratulations on the freedom thing, dude.
  • Regarding: "I won’t even address how offensive it is to have tax-exempt religious organizations inject money and resources into politics. Whatever their agenda, they are making an effort with a lot of tax-exempt money to shape the political landscape via out-of-state money and resources."

    I think we are in agreement here. Of course, I would also apply this to: Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac, World Can't Wait Coalition, unions, Al Sharpton's National Action News, ACORN, etc...

    I criticize unions for taking their members money and donating it "on their behalf" and agree that this should apply to churches to. A better solution is for them to encourage their members to donate, and leave it up to them.
  • Well, we can hash over Fannie/Freddie etc in a different post. As a church
    member who tithes, I would be extraordinarily offended to discover that
    even one cent of a tithe went to support the Yes on 8 cause. And more so if
    I discovered those funds were comingled with donations tied to Blackwater.
  • I'm sure you would! And I'm also sure you would take your tithes elsewhere. It's something of a natural check and balance. As I type this, I'm actually starting to rethink my prior statement. Churches, charities and unions* are all opt-in groups. If you don't like the group you can stop supporting it. Attend a different church, work in a non-unionized shop (unless you are a state/federal employee), or stop donating to a charity. Basically, these groups can only pull this crap once, before you wise up.

    I think my problem is when organizations with any sort of taxpayer money use the monies for political campaigns. I think that is criminal.


    For the record, my church held a separate tithe for those who supported Prop 8, and reaffirmed that they would NEVER use any tithed money for political purposes. I'm actually quite proud of how this was handled by my church, especially when compared to the larger churches in town.
  • The problem with the opt-in model when it comes to churches? Churches are not obligated to disclose how finances are specifically allocated. They could report funds sent to the yes on 8 groups as missions giving amd we'd never know. Nor would we have anything to say about it.
  • Good point... I guess I take it for granted that both churches I've attended in my adult life have given extensive disclosure of all their financial expenditures. If a church would be so sinister as to "hide" political contributions under "Missions Giving", then they're going to have a bit of explaining to do with the guy upstairs!
  • I'm very concerned that Prop 8 will legalize polygamy.. That's why I'm going to leave things as they are and vote NO on PROP 8.
blog comments powered by Disqus