Open Letter to Senator Clinton, #2
Dear Senator Clinton, and to some extent, former President Clinton,
Despite the inevitable drubbing I will receive from my mother and uncle, I have decided that if you somehow wrest the nomination away from Barack Obama, I will not cast my vote for you in the general election.
I was asked on Newsgang Live on 4/30 whether I would vote for you, and I answered yes. The ensuing discussion has stayed in my head for 36+ hours now, and as the news cycles have inexorably progressed toward a whole lot of nothing this week, the following truths keep coming back to me:
A vote for you is a vote for Bush/Rove political conduct.
A vote for you affirms that dirty campaigns win.
A vote for you suppresses all of the new Democrats who truly believed they could transform politics by raising their collective voices.
A vote for you sells out progressive politics.
A vote for you validates the covert racism you’ve encouraged and even promoted during this campaign.
I can’t do that. I remember voting for your husband in 1992, captivated by his message and promise. I remember the anger I felt when his (and your) agenda was stalled over and over again by the focus on external, irrelevant, personal issues. I watched as the country marked time for 8 years, I watched Ken Starr dance while Capitol Hill burned. As my frustration mounted, so did my disappointment, because every time we’d be at the brink of success, your collective skeletons jumped out of the closet.
Now you have become the very thing that stalled President Clinton’s agenda.
You snark your way down the campaign trail, claiming you’ve been fully vetted by the opposition when anyone with half a brain knows they’re just holding it back for the perfect time and place.
You change accents like you change your shoes. Depending on whether you’re stomping in mud with your hiking boots or dancing around the race issues in spiky heels, you wear the accent and the message that fits that moment, proving you’re as phony as a three dollar bill while pretending to give a damn.
I’m having trouble forgetting the “Screw ‘em” comment made about Southern Democrats while you were convening at Camp David to lick yours and your husband’s wounds after the mid-term elections turned your Congressional majority into a minority.
I’m having difficulty forgetting your coy little “as far as I know” remark when asked directly about whether Barack Obama was a Muslim, and if you were standing in front of me today I’d call you out as the bitch that you are for kissing Bill O’Reilly’s ass while wearing your Jeremiah Wright-eousness like a cloak of inpenetrable armor.
I want a woman to be elected President in my lifetime. But the woman I want in the White House is one who doesn’t have to become a Republican in order to win the Democratic nomination. The woman I want in the White House stands toe-to-toe with her opponents and refrains from personal attacks, backstabbing, press flurries about nothing, and swiftboating in order to win.
The woman I want in the White House is the same kind of woman I am raising my daughter to be. Respectful. Smart. Creative. Passionate. Compassionate. Fair. Honest.
You are not that woman.
This is a horrible decision to make. But if you steal this nomination, I will not vote a straight Democratic ticket in November. I will not remain a Democrat. I will change my party affiliation to Independent.
For the past three months, the DNC has asked me for donations. I have chosen not to give anything to them and will continue to choose that until the nomination is decided. At that time, I will either choose to donate or choose to withdraw.
The outcome is in the hands of the remaining states to vote, the superdelegates, and the leadership of the Democratic party.
Make no mistake. This is not sour grapes thinking. It is the only way I know to put pressure on the Democratic party to abandon the wrong-headed politics of the past.
It is the only way I know to send the message that smear campaigns do not sit well with all voters who are not old-thinking white men and women who make decisions based on race rather than merit, or who are smart enough to see through them.
It is the only way I know to teach my children that their voices count, now and in the future.
Technorati Tags: Clinton, dirty politics, general election, voter suppression
Sphere: Related Content
May 2nd, 2008 at 1:15 am
Bill drifted through the NC county of my birth day before yesterday, arriving late and leaving early for another destination where the campaign donation pickings were better. One manipulation too many for some old friends there, who are now no longer in the Billary camp. & if HRC gets the nod, they’ll vote McCain without so much as blinking.
May 2nd, 2008 at 3:28 am
I know what a tough decision this is to make, because I’ve been grappling with it myself.
But I can’t imagine voting McCain and his 100 more years in Iraq either.
I’m afraid if HRC gets the nod, the Democratic party will simply implode.
May 2nd, 2008 at 4:58 am
I will vote Democratic regardless, although if its for Hillary, I’ll be holding my nose to do it. I fear that Hillary being the candidate will motivate more to vote for McCain. Ironic that the hope that Obama represents is the 1992 Clinton version. Don’t forget Nader is “running” again, and could be a spoiler, again…
Desperately seeking optimism, hope and truth,
Jane
May 2nd, 2008 at 6:37 am
Amen, brother… I agree with you 100%. Hillary and Bill are acting without shame.
May 2nd, 2008 at 6:41 am
Was the Ferraro bit mentioned on the April 30 NewsGang verified, that bit about her claiming Obama engineered the whole Wright thing?
That didn’t strike me as particularly crazy on her part. If legit, it strikes me as calculated. I’ve watched Rove do this; I teach a writing course based around media criticism, and it became a kind of scavenger hunt for my students to see what Rove or some other proxy was accusing someone of, and then to trace how that was actually being done by the administration. It was fun — I didn’t have to introduce any politics, just offer up as much info as possible, and the students started to find the rhetorical patterns (there’s a good one between Rove, Rumsfeld, and who was actually talking to insurgents in Baghdad).
By calling out the other side and accusing them of something your side has done, it deflects and confuses the shallow investigation arm of the media.
So knowing that the person who organized Wright’s speech was an enthusiastic Clinton supporter, and that Wright was familiar with the Clinton’s probably before he knew much about Obama (there were photos of Wright with the Clintons from the 90’s), I wonder if Wright was encouraged by people closer to Clinton, and if Ferraro’s comment — if it happened — was a Roveroo (Karl Rove Switcheroo).
May 2nd, 2008 at 10:10 am
Thanks, everyone!
@MissM, I thought like you did. But the problem I have is that if Hillary Clinton were to get the nomination, and I were to vote for her and she won, the message left behind would be a solid warning to any politician who chose to run for office in an ethical and upright fashion. That message is “only dirty politics win”.
A victory by Hillary Clinton is no victory at all. It would mean losing all those engaged new Democrats to apathy or the Republicans. It encourages the incompetent and biased reporting we’ve seen throughout this primary season.
It gives legitimacy to illegitimate practices, and that’s why I finally had to agree with Steve — not rewarding bad behavior, even when it’s painful, is the better choice.
May 2nd, 2008 at 10:20 am
[...] the more I think about this, the more strongly I feel about my early morning rant.Technorati Tags: Clinton, Obama, ABC, Stephanopoulos Sphere: Related [...]
May 2nd, 2008 at 3:37 pm
[...] Open Letter to Senator Clinton, #2 - Bang the Drum Here here, Karoli. Great post. (tags: politics clinton obama) [...]
May 3rd, 2008 at 3:18 am
You’re right Karoli. I’ve always tried to vote for who I thought would be the best president between the choices given, and find myself voting against lies and for truth, as best as I can. I believe that public financing of elections is one way of turning this boat around and making elections more positive. I just wish they were campaigning against McCain, instead of each other. The continuation of the primaries is ridiculous and weakens our position.
As to continued engagement of the citizenry, I’ve come to the conclusion that apathy is rampant. I believe that Obama is the antidote, with his message of hope and what America can be, but isn’t now.
May 3rd, 2008 at 8:28 am
Karoli, I understand your logic about the result of not voting if Hillary Clinton is the Democratic nominee. I hear you on the Independent Party. I really do get the logic but my heart is not there yet.
I’m praying that she will be a non-issue soon and I won’t have to think about voting or not voting for her. I don’t believe anything she says so who’s to say there will be real difference between her and McCain?
Heaven help us help ourselves!