Comments on: Taylor Marsh = Hillary’s Ann Coulter

By: Bostondreams

Bostondreams — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:17:45 +0000

A harsh comparison, but truer words were never spoken.

By: JoeCitizen

JoeCitizen — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 23:16:14 +0000

Bingo.
Great comparison.

By: Pug

Pug — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:50:03 +0000

Taylor’s complete plunge into insanity started not long after Super Tuesday. She’s been getting shriller and shriller since.

I think that’s a word, right? Shriller? If it isn’t it should be.

By: Karoli

Karoli — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 21:04:50 +0000

Donna,

It’s those shades of gray that are going to eat the Dems alive. Shrill apologists like Taylor Marsh and Howard Wolfson who continue to insist on dragging the campaigns down into the mud are going to do harm to the Democrats in the national election. The GOP are grinning over this little scuffle, which is really nothing at all but is so full of loaded, nasty language that it gives all sorts of little negative bites for November TV ads.

I can honestly say that if it continues in this vein, I would have a great deal of difficulty being supportive of HRC should she win the nomination.

By: Donna

Donna — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:25:03 +0000

I find this very disturbing. I always thought of the right as people who see things in black and white, with no shades of gray — that Democratic party is messier because we are more tolerant of differences. That has always appealed to me, because the world IS complicated and none of us is going to have the exact same opinion on EVERY issue. We don’t need no stinkin’ litmus tests, and I don’t want to give credence to someone who applies them.